Welcome to the Shumla Blog!

by | Jan 15, 2018

Welcome to the first post of the new Shumla Blog! We started this blog to be able to share our ongoing research with our friends, colleagues, and collaborators around the world. All of us at Shumla are very excited for the ability to share our progress from our newest research program, the Alexandria Project.

Shumla Staff: Jessica Lee, Karen Steelman, Brenda Norman, Vicky Roberts, Jerod Roberts, Amanda Castaneda, and Charles Koenig. Not pictured are Keith Mann and Kate Snow.

**This post is based on the presentation given by Vicky Roberts at the 2017 Texas Archeological Society Annual Meeting in Grapevine, Texas, titled: “Research Questions Driving Rock Art Recording Methodology in the Alexandria Project”**

By Charles Koenig and Vicky Roberts

The Lower Pecos Canyonlands of southwest Texas and northern Coahuila, Mexico is home to some of the world’s most complex prehistoric art (Boyd 2003, 2016; Shafer 2013; Turpin 2010). The visual and material culture characterizing the region and its prehistoric inhabitants extends approximately 110 km north and 150 km south of the United States-Mexico border (from Sheffield, Texas, to the Arroyo de la Babia in Coahuila, Mexico). From east to west, the region stretches approximately 125 km between the communities of Carta Valley and Dryden, Texas. Over four thousand years ago, hunter-gatherer artists began transforming this arid region into a painted landscape, and today the rock art of the Lower Pecos is known to be some of the oldest rock art in North America (e.g. Bates et al. 2015). The majority of the known Lower Pecos rock art north of the US-Mexico border is in Val Verde County. Due to the age of many of these sites, some of the paintings are being lost due to natural impacts (e.g., sun exposure, spalling, flooding, etc.).

Within Val Verde County alone there are of over 300 known rock art sites, and there are currently five identified rock art styles, ranging in age between 2200 B.C. and A.D. 1800: Pecos River, Red Linear, Bold Line Geometric, Red Monochrome, and Historic (Boyd 2016; Kirkland and Newcomb 1967; Turpin 2004). All of the defined rock art styles in the region are pictographs (painted images), but there are some petroglyphs (carved, pecked, or incised images) as well that have received less attention.

The most common rock art style in the region is Pecos River Style, famous for the large, multicolored murals that adorn numerous Lower Pecos rockshelters and caves. Based on the work by Shumla’s founder, Dr. Carolyn Boyd, many of the Pecos River Style murals are complex, planned compositions that were created to communicate the Lower Pecos hunter-gatherer’s beliefs, understanding of the natural and supernatural world, and their place within the cosmos.

Although Shumla and other researchers have intensively studied the Pecos River Style images, Lower Pecos hunter-gatherers produced a diversity of other images that have been less-studied, but are no less important for understanding Lower Pecos foraging peoples. All of these images and sites together create a large, complex, and enduring library of information that provide clues into the prehistory of the region.

The Alexandria Project

Of the more than 300 known rock art sites in Val Verde County, few have received the detailed documentation and iconographic description crucial for studying and protecting these endangered sites. This past August Shumla launched our most ambitious documentation project to date, with the goal of conducting baseline documentation at all of the known rock art sites within Val Verde County.

The project name, The Alexandria Project, harkens back to the Library of Alexandria in Egypt, which burned in 48 BC. A staggering amount of knowledge about ancient philosophy, astronomy, and mythology was destroyed in that fire. As though we had discovered a room of the lost library of Alexandria, we have built a three-year research and data management plan to fully catalog and digitize this treasure of knowledge and ensure that every image is available to researchers for years to come.

The Shumla research team celebrates documenting the first site of the Alexandria Project.

Over the course of The Alexandria Project, Shumla will be pursuing the following overarching goals via baseline documentation of Lower Pecos rock art sites:

  1. To collect data that can be used to address a variety of research questions and inform Lower Pecos rock art research/scholarship for years to come.
  2. To determine the threatened status of rock art sites and to prioritize future documentation efforts accordingly.
  3. To build stronger relationships with local landowners, land managers, and site stewards.
  4. To share what we learn and increase public awareness in the importance of preserving and protecting these rock art sites for future generations.
The Shumla research team documenting rock art sites during the Alexandria Project.

Alexandria Data Collection

Since 2007, Shumla has focused our data collection on intensively documenting individual sites like White Shaman, Panther Cave, and Rattlesnake Canyon. This approach is invaluable for learning about the iconography present at a single site, but the entire data collection process is very time consuming because of the meticulous, labor intensive methods we employ. For instance, full documentation of a large site can take upwards of three years because of the sheer volume of data collected. While this level of documentation is incredibly important, we recognize that for many sites time is running out. In response, Shumla has resolved to conduct baseline documentation for all known and accessible rock art sites in Val Verde County in just three years of intensive field work.

Shumla’s baseline documentation methods can be split into three levels of data collection: (1) Core Data; (2) High-Resolution Panel Data; and (3) Specialty Analysis Data. Core data include a standardized archaeological site form (TexSite), site maps, daily recording notes, GPS points, and site context photos. All of these data together document the current condition of the entire archaeological site, and give future researchers more specific information about the rock art present at the site. Also included in the Core Data is rock art specific information recorded on our Shumla Rock Art Site Form. These data will allow researchers to search for specific styles, look for patterns in causes of rock art deterioration, as well as specific iconographic symbols and motifs (look for more on this topic in a future blog post!).
Iconographic Inventory PDF

To collect Core Data, the Shumla research team uses a combination of low- and high-tech methods.

High Resolution Panel Data

For collecting High-Resolution Panel Data we use three primary techniques:

  • Structure from Motion (SfM) 3D modeling,
  • GigaPan photography, and
  • General Panel Photography.

SfM and GigaPan require taking dozens to hundreds of overlapping photographs, and both create very high-resolution images of the entire rock art panels being documented. How we use SfM and GigaPan photography will be detailed in our next blog post, but the main differences are SfM produces a scaled, 3D model of the entire rock art panel, whereas with the GigaPan image creates a high-resolution panorama taken from a single location. General Panel Photography (GPP) is when we take individual, high resolution photographs of portions of each rock art panel. In many cases we use GPP when it is not possible or feasible to do SfM or GigaPan photography of a rock art panel.

GigaPan Images:

Reduced-sized GigaPan image of Red Beene Shelter.
Reduced-sized GigaPan image showing the main panel at Red Beene Shelter enhanced in DStretch (LRE).

Specialty Analysis Data

The final level of data we collect on-site is what we consider Specialty Analysis Data. Specialty Analysis Data is primarily comprised of high-resolution photography of known motifs present across the Lower Pecos. At the moment we are only collecting these data on three reoccurring motifs: Otherworld Journey, Peyotism, and Antlered Anthropomorphs.

Otherworld Journey Motifs (or OWJs) are relatively common images depicted in Pecos River Style. Typically, OWJs consist of two images, an anthropomorphic figure and a portal, and the anthropomorphs are in the process of passing though the portal. OWJs come in a variety of shapes and sizes, including the two examples below from Fate Bell Annex and Wiley shelter.

Depictions of The Peyotism Motif are not as common as OWJs, but occasionally we do document the Peyotism Motif during the Alexandria Project. Peyotism Motif includes (typically) an anthropomorphic figure with an antler headdress with dots on the antler tines, impaled deer, impaled dots, and impaled anthropomorphs. The below example of the Peyotism is from Black Cave Annex.

A Peyotism Motif at Black Cave Annex in real-color (top) and DStretch INV YBK enhancement (bottom). This Peyotism Motif consists of an anthropomorph with an antler rack with dots wrist adornment, impaled deer, impaled anthropomorphs, and impaled dots.

Antlered Anthropomorphs are most-commonly depicted in Pecos River Style. As the name suggests, this recurring motif consists of anthropomorphic figures with antler rack headdresses. The below examples of antlered figures were documented during the Alexandria Project at Chiminea and Sunburst Shelters.

Specialty Analysis Data

Additional Specialty Analysis Data includes portable X-ray fluoresce (pXRF) analysis of pigments to identify the elementals present within the paints (e.g., Koenig et al. 2014), and occasionally we even collect stratigraphic data (looking at the paint layering) using a Dinolite microscope when we’re in the field. Watch for more details of these in future blog posts!

Alexandria Research Questions and Ongoing Data Analysis

Depending on the rock art preserved at a site, baseline documentation can take anywhere from a couple hours to two days. As we continue to collect data from different rock art sites, we are beginning the process of data analysis. Our data analysis is guided by several research questions that we have developed while planning for the Alexandria Project. These questions are:

  1. Are there patterns in rock art site location?
  2. Are there patterns in the spatial distribution of rock art styles and motifs?
  3. What is the range of variation of well-known motifs (e.g., Otherworld Journey, Peyotism, etc.)?
  4. Are there sub-styles within the Pecos River style?
  5. Investigating Red Linear in the Lower Pecos
  6. Are there any currently unknown rock art styles that exist in the region?

All of these questions can be addressed using the visual, iconographic, and geospatial information we collect as part of the Alexandria Project. The first step in addressing any of our research questions is processing the SfM 3D models, GigaPan panoramas, and entering all of our Rock Art Site Form data into our Shumla Rock Art Database. All of these data will allow us to begin searching for patterns in the rock art. Inevitably there will be additional questions that arise as we and future researchers continue to study this complex visual culture.

By using these methods at each site we are able to not only digitally preserve the rock art imagery for future generations, but also provide an unparalleled visual and spatial inventory of Lower Pecos rock art to inform current and future research. To date we have visited over 30 sites on our way to 300+, and at each site we visit we learn new information.

Follow our blog, Facebook, and sign up for our eNews to stay up to date with the Alexandria Project!

References Cited

Bates, Lennon N., Amanda M. Castaneda, Carolyn E. Boyd, and Karen L. Steelman

2015
A Black Deer at Black Cave: New Pictograph Radiocarbon Date for the Lower Pecos, Texas. Journal of Texas Archaeology and History 2:45-57.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4p1SsI5fon7aG8waXRTQVFNVlU/view

Boyd, Carolyn E.

2003
Rock art of the Lower Pecos. Texas A & M University Press, College Station.
2016
The White Shaman Mural. University of Texas Press, Austin.

Kirkland, Forrest and W.W. Newcomb

1967
The Rock Art of Texas Indians. University of Texas Press, Austin.

Koenig, C.W., A.M. Castaneda, C.E. Boyd, M.W. Rowe, and K.L. Steelman

2014
Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy of Pictographs: A Case Study from the Lower Pecos Canyonlands, Texas. Archaeometry 56(S1):168-186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12060

Shafer, Harry J (Editor).

2013
Painters in Prehistory. Trinity University Press, San Antonio, Texas.

Turpin, Solveig A.

2004
The Lower Pecos River Region of Texas and Northern Mexico. In The Prehistory of Texas, Ed Timothy K. Perttula. Texas A & M University Press, College Station.
2010
El arte indigena en Coahuila. Universidad Autonoma de Coahuila. Saltillo, Coahuila.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *